(a) In this case, the plot of land for school is far away from the village and it would be difficult for children to attend the school. Further, the plot of land is located within the heritage site and it would not be possible to construct the school without damaging the site. Hence, it is possible that the predecessor was colluding with the sarpanch so that government develops the area near the school site and they can later sell the land at a much higher cost later.

 

(b) (i) If we wait for the senior officer to come, we can use his experience and expertise. However, it would delay the decision-making process

(ii) If we seek his advice in writing or on phone, we can rectify the mistake early. However, senior officer may be displeased, if he comes across new facts during his visit.

(iii) We may consult the predecessor and colleagues to know their side of the story for better decision-making. However, this may alert them that their mischief has been detected. They may try to manipulate facts or destroy records.

(iv) If we can find a good plot near the village in exchange for this plot, it would solve the problem of the heritage site and enable us to construct the school near the village. This seems to be the best option However, this would mean changing a plan already approved by government.

 

We may also discuss the matter with the villagers for some more alternatives, which may be presented before the senior officer during his visit for his approval. (270 words)